R O N I Nammar yasir’s personal blog

The news that Facebook confounder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg may face a death penalty by Lahore High Court didn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has been following the facebook fiasco in Pakistan. Keeping in view the recent few verdicts by LHC which ironically defied some basic laws of physics, geography and common sense; there is a major possibility that the young entrepreneur from New York gets a death penalty under Criminal Code 295-C on blasphemy laws.

Now I am not here to discuss the global pitfall of such verdict in the age of social media, nor will I defend the future of internet for those Pakistanis who make a living out of it. Because let’s face it a country experiencing crisis like energy, inflation, terrorism, corruption, starvation etc. should care less about bad publicity in an international market where its local entrepreneurs and businessmen are trying to make some name and money. Being an ideological and fundamentalists nation that we are, under no circumstances we should compromise our religious integrity and the right to protest against infidels running blasphemous sites on the World Wide Web.

But just for conversation sake, why these condemnations or speedy rulings are restricted to certain issues. We are ready to go to any extent if a non believer mocks our sacred values but if a believer in religious apparel commits a suicide attack or is guilty of sectarian violence, we conveniently shy away.

Since the “golden” period of Zia, Pakistan is home to sectarian criminals. The political progeny of the military dictator might condemn military ruling in the country but are continuing the same legacy of sectarian prejudice. Punjab Government has never denied their political coalition with the debarred organization of Sipah Sahabah. In fact sometimes I wonder who’s the real boss of Rana Sanaullah; Sharif or Ludhianvi?

FYI: the love is not one sided:

The irony doesn’t ends here as terrorists are let go on lack of evidence, while the remaining find a work around. All these facts reassure us that there will be another attack on Manawa training center, the target killing of Shias will continue as the perpetrators of the Ashoura tragedy are out there planning another attack. The Ahmadis will continue to live under the fear of getting mass murdered, again. And each attack will be followed by feeble condemnations and monotonous rhetoric’s. But all this violence shouldn’t stop LHC from sentencing the real terrorist, Mark Zuckerberg.

Popularity: 19% [?]

1998 was a very eventful year in the history of Pakistan. That year Pakistan became a “nuclear power”, same year Pakistani rock band Junoon was touring India. The year proved out to be doubly eventful for the rock band when a political statement from bands lead vocalist Ali Azmat got them banned in Pakistan. In his statement Ali condemned the nuclear tests by both countries and denounced the nuclear proliferation in Subcontinent.  Coming from a rock musician the statement sounded quite reasonable but Nawaz Sharifs previous administration took it quite gravely. The ministry of information of that time not only banned Junoon or popular music of any type but ensured that nobody appears on the national television wearing jeans (WTF?)

Looking back everything changed since 1998:

· Ali Azmat is bald now, Nawaz Sharif is not.

· Abdul Qadeer Khan, once our national hero is now (somewhat) controversial.

· North West Frontier Province has a new name.

· Jeans is no more the symbol of liberalism but expressing your love and admiration for the neighboring country (Hint: Aman ki *beep* Aasha) is now considered as liberal and highly fashionable. And by neighboring country I don’t mean Afghanistan here

But one thing that took the country by storm is Pakistan’s FREE mainstream media (cough *mafia* cough). Free media was General (retired) Musharraf’s only democratic gift to this country. The same gift took his beloved wardee and Government away from him (You too Hamid Brutus Meer?). Today, media is fast becoming the most powerful entity of this country. They freely exercise the power to change election results (Hint: NA 55 elections). They can take a non issue and make an elephant out of it and vice versa. But apart from the political circus, toppling of democratic or military governments, Pakistani media right now has the power to decide what is morally correct and what’s not which makes it more dangerous than it used to be back in the military days of Zia.

Back in the day, it was mandatory for any actress appearing on the national TV to wear Dopatta on her head. Apart from the Government, self appointed moral police (Jamat e Islami and other religious parties) were out there forcing their version of Sharia on very Pakistani soul. Even today, one can easily witness Taliban apologist journos and TV anchors defending terrorism by labeling it a reaction of military attack. But when it comes to commercial interests ; where is media’s moral or religious stand? For the past two and a half week every Pakistani news channel is acting like a gossip girl. Glorifying a love affair and portraying it as a matter of national security.

We all have witnessed the TV anchors crying their hearts out on how President Zardari is harboring all the Presidential powers and not sharing it with the Prime Minister as he should. How he is no different from the military dictator Musharraf when it comes to balance of power. But what happened when the amendment took place?  Sania / Malik scandal made headlines and the historic bill got minimal air time. There is no age rating on any of the the TV programs, which means that an individual of any age group can view any TV program despite from its impact on their minds.

I might sound like a right winger here but do you think that its morally okay to glamorize a scandal where a young man secretly marries than divorces a woman whom he met on the internet for a tennis star who appears more attractive than the first girl? And not only glamorizing the scandal but showcasing every dirty aspect of this crappy affair which involves abortion, betrayal, moral and ethical corruption? Has any responsible media person ever realized, that for the lust of high channel rating they are exposing young minds to moral corruption. There is not a sing quiz show or educational program on any of the popular channels. Educationists and entrepreneurs who make achievements dont make TV appearences or headlines. There is no positive news or image to follow for these young kids. The popular source of information for Pakistani teenagers are these TV channels where the only national achievement that takes maximum air time is a lousy celebrity scandal.

I wonder why Jamat e Islami or TTP didn’t say a word against this absurd media behavior, why not a  single moral fatwa was issued? Why no news channel was threatened for playing Indian movie songs in the middle of a news bulletin. Where is Jamat e Islami and their moral police? Where is Taliban when you need them?!

Popularity: 43% [?]

Circling the underground music scene for the past few years, I came across T2F (The Second Floor), a project by PeaceNiche (a not-for-profit social entrepreneurship organization), determined to revive the coffee-house culture, that gave voice to such progressive writers  and poets like  Sa’adat Hassan Manto and Ahmed Nadeem Qasmi in early Pakistani literary history, but seemed to have faded with time. From the fifteenth century coffee houses of Damascus and Cairo, the coffee house phenomenon has had its share of ups, downs, revelations, bans and revolts. But as long as people choose to think, the cycle will go on. Bringing live music to coffee houses can be credited to the 60’s American political/folk musicians like Dylan, which served as a great idea for young musicians to find small audiences in intimate settings.

T2F reminds me of the 90’s hit show “Fresh Prince of Bel-Air”, where young Afro-Americans found home at coffee houses for raw expression to vent out decades of suppressed emotions, rather than taking it to the streets. And we can’t help but relate to that, considering the rapidly deteriorating socio-economic/political conditions in our own country.

The recent Open Mic event was another example of how much nurturing the artistic side of our society needs and how these artists go widely un-noticed due to a lack of similar platforms. We keep cursing the music industry for having lost it’s stature within the international music scene, and for musicians who can’t play their own songs live, let alone improvise… but watching these young musicians pour their hearts out that night helped me regain some hope.

The multi-talented comedian-cum-musician host Saad Haroon made sure that there was never a dull moment, keeping in place the rhythm of the whole event, and keeping the audience occupied while each group went through sound check. His Meera jokes, of course, sent the roof flying off with roars and laughter.

The highlight of the evening, for me, was when Sax player Miqdaad Mohammad played “Hey Soul Sister” with a little help from ADP (Aunty Disco Project) member, Ali. His melodic saxophone notes complemented with a strong vocal style made a perfect combination that helped lift the audience’s spirits. Another noticeable act was the duo “Saada Khushboo” that played their own unique blend of acoustic blues and upbeat percussion’s.

The Viccaji sisters, with their soft tones, had their own individual flavors to bring to the audience and their harmonic chemistry was definitely applaudable. An un-announced pop-in by Haniya from “Zeb and Haniya” was also a pleasant surprise. The closing band ‘Bell’ played around with their improvised instrumentals and got multiple encore requests before the night could end. And last, but not the least, hats off to Omar Bilal (better known as OBA) from ADP for bringing together all these people in one room.

A little over 10 pm, the gig seemed to have ended too soon, even with more than a dozen acts. But that’s just one of the perks, unfamiliar to us Karachiites, of actually starting on time (:

- Contributed by Saqib Ahmed

Photo Credits: Jamash

Video Credits: Jehan Ara

Popularity: 41% [?]

Does School, colleges and universities really stop you from thinking big? Are they preparing you for an office job when you can aim higher and think way bigger? Let’s first hear 17 year old APICTA and Pasha Award winner Zayd Inam who according to some, is Pakistan’s Steve Jobs in the making.

So this young man believes that schools play a good part in killing innovation, as they are always about exams, grades and assignments. Knowledge is essential but without practical implications, an individual will lend up with an average job in some office. Now, something that took me 16 years of formal education and 2 years of working experience to understand came naturally to Zayd. It got me thinking about the number of courses that I took at school, colleges or at university level that never ever helped me in anyway, I am sure you share a similar experience. Now if you take those credit hours and subtract them with your educational period, the number that comes out will surprise you or make you angry in my case.

When I put up the same question on twitter, I got many interesting answers. Munir Usman (MVP and Entrepreneur) who by degree is a telecom graduate but pursued his career in the software industry. On my question, whether schools are responsible for killing innovation among students, replied:

“Ideally they are not meant to kill innovation, but looking down at the quality of local education. They are not only killing innovation but are responsible for destroying a good amount of time of the students. Instead of giving proper education to help innovation, they waste time and money in useless courses and activities, as a result students end up doing Ratta (memorizing course lectures) for exams.

When I asked Sabahat Zakariya the same question, she gave quite an interesting reply:

Schools only have meaning when an extremely rare teacher not yet jaded by the system and the administration comes and inspires you. All schools care about are grades for they are quantifiable, abstractions have no meaning in a school ’system’.

On my question to Sabhat and Shahrzad (teacher from Iran) on how we can improve this situation in schools, their reply was:

Stop nurturing mediocrity in faculty. Stop ostracizing teachers with opinions, passion and a voice – Sabahat

Students should be motivated to discover, arousing sense of yearning to learn instead of giving them some formulas to pass the exams- Shahrzad

During my initial experience at work, I met a business man who used to teach entrepreneurship at Pakistan’s top business school; IBA. According to him once an individual passes early 20’s the chances of becoming an entrepreneur almost diminishes and sadly these top business schools are not making leaders but labors. This was a very strong statement coming from a teacher who was very much involved in the business market. On my question to Munir on whether Universities should encourage or teach entrepreneurship at graduation level, his reply was:

Yes the course should be mandatory in every degree but the million dollar question is, who will teach this subject? Most teachers won’t qualify to teach this subject

Muhammed Nawaz (IT Consultant) coined following views on the same question:

Yes Of course they should. One thing important to understand is whether they consider self confidence a virtue or taboo Self confidence raises the chances of people actually taking decisions in their own hands and doing what’s right for them. At the same time, ensuring that with all this virtue comes the aspect of responsibility So when they take a decision, they know what the impact of their decision would be. Accordingly take a step forward.

So if Schools are not doing their jobs right why the parents are desperate to enroll their children in the most expensive of schools. But can you blame them for doing so? Their aim for getting their children admitted in popular schools is to get an admission in a good college or a renowned university, so their children end up with a secure future and a job that pays off well at the end of every month. Not every family can afford an entrepreneur in their house; somebody has to pay mortgage on regular basis. So it’s more about economics then learning or getting education.

Conclusion:

Dropping off from college or Universities is not a preferred option, not every kid is as bright as Zayd or Steve Jobs for that matter. A lot of us might start off slow but end up being a successful individual and professional. Having said that there should be a regular check on the curriculum of college and universities, considering the dropping standards of local educational boards like HEC. The need of having a quality educational body has become inevitable. This independent body will work like a bridge between educational institutes and business market.

Popularity: 58% [?]

The New York Time video report ‘Tuning Out the Taliban’ after its release started a new debate in the Pakistani literary corner. Are we living in denial? Is Taliban not Pakistan’s enemy number # 1? Are the newcons trying to de Islamize Pakistan? Has Ali Azmat gone nuts? These are few of the many questions that we all ask ourselves in the current situation. But one apparent trend that can easily be spotted among these pseudo intellectual debates, is the thirst for change in our masses especially in the thinking young generation. The generation before us gave us the legacy of nothingness. The oldies were married to their traditions; they made no significant change in their time and the mess that we live in today is the gift of their laziness and pseudo-traditional-religious bull crap.

But wait, if the new generation hates all that then why people like Zaid Hamid are attracting these young minds. Why the man in the red cap who is the Wikipedia of “Islamic historic achievements” and the google of conspiracy plans (cooked by the Zionists against the great Muslims) is getting popular among the masses with his rhetoric narrations. One theory states, that for every nation that wants to evolve from the ruins should be reminded of the very foundation the nation stands on. Therefore the young minds should be reminded repeatedly of Islam’s past achievements and traditional enemies. Even for a second if we approve the mentioned theory, even then Zaid Hamid’s rhetoric’s falls flat. Because we can’t hide the fact that Islamic history despite its achievements had a brutal not so pleasant past. One big example is the assassination of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) grandson in the hands of men who claimed to be Muslims, that one incident created a rift that resulted in the number of sects the religion has today. But was this predicament ever address by Zaid Hamid or any religious cleric or critic for that matter?

This negligence resulted in another apologist point of view that allowed an individual (who claimed to be religiously righteous, wore a long beard and pointed every apposing entity haram or biddat) to be supreme even if that person committed great crimes including the killing of innocent lives. One historic example is Mughal King Aurangzeb who put his father behind the bars, and killed all his brothers just to be on throne. Aurangzeb just because of his apparent religious inclination is considered to be righteous and humble. The same apologist theory was preached during Zia regime in Pakistan and the American aided Afghan war was labeled Jehad. The same apologist theory today is endorsed by people who believe that a Muslim cant carry out a suicide attack and in other words these terrorists are not Muslims neither Taliban. It’s a big black (water) American/Zionist conspiracy. If you ask me today how many people in Pakistan support Taliban; my answer would be 1 out of every fourth individual is a Taliban supporter one way or the other. Reason, pointing fingers is easier then solving the mess in your backyard.

We are desperately in need of a practical leader who will be an example and lead us out of this mess. Yes Islam had a glorious past but the inglorious part of Islam which was never addressed in the past has now become the ugly part of our everyday life. We find justifications for Taliban if they blow up girl schools or conduct a suicide attack in Peshawar every day. People like Zaid Hamid or Israr Ahmed never in their own lives did anything practical that changed the lives of others for good.

If we look up the recent history:

I would like to play the role that Zaid Hamid plays in his programs but instead I will look up the history that actually matters today, and not the one that can only make me feel good.

In January 1996, two Stanford University PhD students Larry Page and Sergey Brin changed the minds of every internet user with their research project which they named “Google”. On October 23, 2001 Apple Computers publicly announced their portable music digital player the iPod, which for every one surprise changed the life style of millions and expectations of an average user from electronic gadgets. YouTube (an online video sharing and viewing community) was named Time Magazines Invention of the year in 2006, nobody at that time knew that one website will completely revolutionized the preferences of tele viewer in the coming days.

These are the few inventions that made it big among the masses in the past 10 years. Ten years is a long period to decide the future trend and historical influences that led to these inventions. All the mentioned achievements came out of west, by individuals who spend their lives in a modern environment and getting education from the west, where religion played little or no role. In contrast we gave the world Al Qaeda and Taliban. Moon sighting is still an issue in our country. When these religious sheriffs cant solve a simple issue, why should we allow them to decide the fate of our lives?

Popularity: 49% [?]